What definitions can I refer to the meaning 'complementizer'?
Apr 9, 2017 · 1. What definitions can I refer to the meaning 'complementizer'? There's little agreement among grammarians on how to categorize the core 'function' words in English; but the term …
syntax - Is ‘for’ a complementizer or a preposition in ‘prefer for John ...
May 3, 2020 · As the title says, in ‘prefer for John to stay’, is ‘for’ a complementizer and the following is a CP, or a preposition?
if vs. whether (complementizer) - Linguistics Stack Exchange
Jul 12, 2017 · Since non-terminal nodes never appear in the data, you can put whatever words you like in them. In this case, arranging things the suggested way makes this difference (whether can govern …
What are the semantic functions of a complementizer phrase (CP)
Oct 22, 2019 · What are the semantic functions of a complementizer phrase (CP) Ask Question Asked 6 years, 3 months ago Modified 6 years, 2 months ago
complements - Is this a complementizer what? - English Language ...
I guess what (1) is a complementizer that moved forth from for 's complement. And it’s the pronoun referring to what happened the night my parents died (2), or short form of this.
Can a complementizer (C) take two complements (COMPS)?
Mar 18, 2024 · In (54), complementizer (C) for is shown to take two complements (COMPS): an NP (them) and a CP (to go to the UK). In generative grammar, is it possible for a comlementizer to have …
Can “of”, “on”, etc. be regarded as complementizers just as “for” is?
Apr 30, 2019 · Actually, the complementizer is usually called "for-to" (not just "for") to keep it apart from the preposition "for". I do not see a case for "on" or "of" as complementizers. Rather, these are …
Is this to a complementizer? - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
‘There is no consensus regarding the application of the word “complementizer” to makers of subordinate status that are inflectional (the genitive marker, -ing, and possibly to)’ says McCawley (1998, Ch. 5). …
Why do you wonder who was dismissed? (Complementizer position)
May 7, 2015 · It's unembedded form would be "Who was dismissed?", so no complementizer was added to convert the independent form into the embedded form. I don't understand why "was" would ever …
syntax - Why must 'that' be omitted whenever constituents are ...
Apr 20, 2020 · Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication (2017 7 ed). p. 196 Middle. Why does [that] complementizer hinder questioning of constituents (in 80b), when [that] …